ENTRNCE has revealed that some businesses could be miscalculating their emissions – and paying the price.
Companies are overstating their emissions by as much as 40%, according to ENTRNCE data. If you are buying carbon credits or voluntary offsets to compensate for emissions, is this taking thousands of pounds off your bottom line?
The anomaly is down to the way that most businesses report on greenhouse gas emissions. Under the GHG Protocol, companies use a dual approach:
Location-based reporting has commonly been held as the more accurate reporting method – as it reflects the emissions from the electricity you are physically tied to.
But, there’s a catch. First, it’s based on average grid emissions, not the specific dates and times that you are consuming electricity.
Second, in the UK, it relies on grid emission factors published by DESNZ. These figures are two years old, and yet, the fossil fuel share in the grid has been declining year on year.
Organisations using these figures may find that their reporting does not reflect the reality of today’s cleaner grid.
Oxford Brookes University is a case in point. Using ENTRNCE’s Matcher platform (which calculates an organisation’s emissions based on half-hourly grid data), the university has discovered that it is over-estimating its emissions by nearly 40%!
Having a more accurate picture will allow Oxford Brookes to reach its carbon targets faster, taker wiser offsetting decisions, and choose technology investments that address, how, when and where it is using fossil fuels.
If you’re curious about whether you are over-reporting on your emissions, get in touch. ENTRNCE can help you calculate your footprint based on the half-hourly realities of the grid. Accuracy matters – and it could have a huge impact on your bottom line.